Legal Opinion

Universal Underwriters v. Anglen

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 22, 1993No. 1920909PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

An insurance company appeals from the denial of its motion to intervene in an action against its insured, alleging fraud in connection with the sale of an automobile. The issues are (1) whether a motion for permissive intervention under Rule 24(b), Ala.R.Civ.P., is reviewable by appeal; (2) if so, whether the trial court erred in denying the motion to intervene; and (3) whether a trial court is required to specify in a written order the basis for its denial of the motion to intervene.

In March 1991, Veronda E. Hammond Anglen purchased a used Mitsubishi Eclipse automobile from Serra Automotive,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Jean L. May, Clifford Magee May, Intervenor-Appellant v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
  2. Cole v. Racetrac Petroleum, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1985

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Farmers Ins. Exch. v. RaineCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2004
  2. Ex Parte Pelham Tank Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2004
  3. Mars Hill Ch. of Anniston, Alabama, Inc. v. Missionary BaptistSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999
  4. Jim Parker Building Co. v. G & S Glass & Supply Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2011
  5. Magee v. BoydSupreme Court of Alabama · 2015

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API