Legal Opinion

Bradford v. Whitcomb

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 9, 1895No. 1940Published

Appeal from Potter. Tried below before Hon. H. H. Wallace.

1Opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.

STEPHENS, Associate Justice.

In support of this motion appellee cites numerous cases from courts of high authority, which, perforce of precedent, entitle him, we think, to the rehearing prayed for. Johnson v. De Peyster, 50 N. Y., 666; Glacius v. Black, 50 N. Y. 145; s. c., 67 N. Y., 563; Phillips v. Gallant, 62 N. Y., 264; Woodward v. Fuller, 80 N. Y., 312; Heckman v. Pinkney, 81 N. Y., 210; Flaherty v. Miner, 123 N. Y., 382; Gallagher v. Sharpless (Pa.), 19 Atl. Rep., 491; Moore v. Carter (Pa.), 23 Atl. Rep., 243; Aetna I. & S. Works v. Kossuth Co., 79 Iowa, 40.

In…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Glacius v. . BlackNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  2. Woodward v. . FullerNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  3. Cone v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  4. Phillip v. . GallantNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  5. Flaherty v. . MinerNew York Court of Appeals · 1890

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API