Legal Opinion

State v. Estacio

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 27, 2006No. 0108-36054; A118666Published

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, P. J.

This case comes to us on remand from the Supreme Court for reconsideration in light of State v. Smith, 339 Or 515, 123 P3d 261 (2005). In our original opinion, State v. Estacio, 199 Or App 16, 110 P3d 624 (2005), we vacated defendant’s convictions and remanded the case to the trial court with instructions to inquire into the reasons for defendant’s appointed counsel’s request to withdraw as defendant’s attorney. On remand, we affirm defendant’s convictions.

We quote the underlying facts as set out in our original opinion, with supplemental facts from the record where relevant:

“The incidents…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Mickens v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  2. Wood v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Shannon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. State v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 2005
  5. State v. DaleyOregon Supreme Court · 1909

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API