Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Lee v. Lee, Unpublished Decision (7-3-2002)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided July 3, 2002No. Case No. 02CA2Unpublished

1Concurrence

I concur in judgment only because I believe the trial court chose the right test but applied it incorrectly. R.C. 3109.04 must, out of necessity, include a parental suitability element in its best interest test. In fairness to the trial court, I must acknowledge that the case law in this area has been inconsistent to say the least. Thus, I am not critical of the trial judge's analytical and thoughtful approach to this case.

We are not asked to assess R.C. 3109.04's constitutionality here, and I do not profess to do so. But, see, Esch v. Esch (Feb. 23, 2001), Montgomery App. No. 18489, which…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Quilloin v. WalcottSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. State Ex Rel. Cooper v. SavordOhio Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Thrasher v. ThrasherOhio Court of Appeals · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API