Legal Opinion
Harrosh v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency
District Court, E.D. California
Decided November 10, 2022No. 2:21-cv-01969Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 Michael Harrosh, No. 2:21-cv-01969-KJM-JDP 12 Plaintiff, ORDER 13 v. 14 Tahoe Regional Planning Agency; George and 15 Virginia Johannessen, 16 Defendants. 17 18 George and Virginia Johannessen obtained approval to build a new pier on their lot on the 19 | west shore of Lake Tahoe. Their neighbor to the south, Michael Harrosh, challenges that 20 | approval in this action, which he filed against the Johannessens and the agency charged with the 21 | approval decision, the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency.…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Bennett v. SpearSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.