Legal Opinion

Fay v. Walsh

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided February 28, 1906PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLoring, J.

This is an action brought to recover 1225.33 for lumber, used in building an open air theatre at Nahant, which the plaintiff alleged was sold by him to the defendants Walsh, Howard and Fletcher, jointly, on July 1, 2 and 3, 1901. The defendant Walsh was defaulted, and the case was defended by Fletcher and Howard. At the conclusion of the evidence the defendants Fletcher and Howard requested the judge to rule that the defendants were entitled to a verdict and that there was no evidence of a partnership. These rulings were refused, and the case is here on exceptions “ to the judge’s refusal to…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hayward v. LessonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1900
  2. Commonwealth v. FordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1881
  3. Commonwealth v. BurtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1903
  4. Costelo v. CrowellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1883
  5. Whitney v. HoughtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1879

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Pickett v. WalshMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
  2. Pizer v. HuntMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
  3. Neff v. NeffSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1921
  4. Lemay v. Springfield Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
  5. Commonwealth v. McDermottMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API