Legal Opinion
People v. Rapp
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided July 27, 2012No. Docket 143343 and 143344PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHathaway, J.
At issue in this case is whether Michigan State University (MSU) Ordinance, § 15.05 is facially unconstitutional. The Court of Appeals reversed the circuit court’s conclusion that the ordinance is unconstitutional under City of Houston, Texas v Hill, 482 US 451; 107 S Ct 2502; 96 L Ed 2d 398 (1987).1 Because we agree with the circuit court’s analysis and conclude that the language in the ordinance making it an offense to “disrupt the normal activity” of a protected person is facially overbroad, as articulated by the United States Supreme Court in Hill, we reverse the portion of the Court of…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Thornhill v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- People v. VandenbergMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014
- State of Washington v. Dennis Wallace PattersonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
- McDonel v. City of DetroitDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2021
- People of Michigan v. Bradly Thomas PetersonMichigan Court of Appeals · 2020
- People of Michigan v. Garrett Jennings Van NetMichigan Court of Appeals · 2026
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.