Randall v. City of Hot Springs
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDillon, J.
This appeal is here on the sufficiency of the complaint tested by a demurrer. The court sustained defendant’s demurrer to plaintiff’s complaint. From this order plaintiff appeals. The main facts, developed 'by the complaint are as follows:
That the defendant is a municipal corporation, and operates under and by virtue of a city charter and code of ordinances passed and in force. That defendant constructed and maintained a system of sidewalks upon its streets, and there devolved upon the defendant the duty of keeping and maintaining the sidewalks in a reasonably safe condition for public travel…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Rowe v. RichardsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1913
- Smith v. City of YanktonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1909
- Salzer v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
- Grossenbach v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1885
- Rose v. City of Fort DodgeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1915
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.