Legal Opinion

Randall v. City of Hot Springs

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1924No. File No. 5155Published

1Opinion of the CourtDillon, J.

This appeal is here on the sufficiency of the complaint tested by a demurrer. The court sustained defendant’s demurrer to plaintiff’s complaint. From this order plaintiff appeals. The main facts, developed 'by the complaint are as follows:

That the defendant is a municipal corporation, and operates under and by virtue of a city charter and code of ordinances passed and in force. That defendant constructed and maintained a system of sidewalks upon its streets, and there devolved upon the defendant the duty of keeping and maintaining the sidewalks in a reasonably safe condition for public travel…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Rowe v. RichardsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Smith v. City of YanktonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Salzer v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Grossenbach v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Rose v. City of Fort DodgeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1915

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API