Legal Opinion · Dissent

People v. Pesquera

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided March 22, 2001No. Docket 209238Published

1DissentM. J. Kelly, J.

I respectfully dissent. I believe the trial court abused its discretion in permitting the children to testify by videotape and in admitting other acts testimony under MRE 404(b)(1). I would reverse.

While the children’s mothers testified that the children were afraid of defendant and of the courtroom setting, the children themselves did not testify at the hearing that they would be unable to testify in defendant’s presence. The record belies the prosecutor’s claim that the children were unable to testify in the courtroom setting. Significantly, following their testimony, the children were able…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Coy v. IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. People v. VanderVlietMichigan Supreme Court · 1993
  3. People v. CrawfordMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
  4. People v. GolochowiczMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  5. People v. StarrMichigan Supreme Court · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API