Legal Opinion

Dimry v. Bert Bell/Pete Rozelle NFL Player Retirement Plan

District Court, N.D. California

Decided September 15, 2020No. 3:19-cv-05360Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 CHARLES DIMRY, Case No. 19-cv-05360-JSC 8 Plaintiff, ORDER RE: CROSS-MOTIONS FOR 9 v. JUDGMENT ON THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD 10 BERT BELL/PETE ROZELLE NFL PLAYER RETIREMENT PLAN, et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 33, 36 11 Defendants. 12 13 Plaintiff is a former player in the National Football League. He challenges the decision of 14 the Retirement Board of the Bert Bell/Pete Rozelle NFL Player Retirement Plan (the “Plan”) to 15 deny him total and permanent disability benefits under the Plan and the Employee Retirement 16 Income…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. United States v. HinksonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  3. Abatie v. Alta Health & Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  4. Wanda Glenn v. Metlife (Metropolitan Life Insurance Company) and Long Term Disability Plan for Associates of Sears, Roebuck and CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
  5. Rhode Island v. Narragansett Indian TribeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API