Dimry v. Bert Bell/Pete Rozelle NFL Player Retirement Plan
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 CHARLES DIMRY, Case No. 19-cv-05360-JSC 8 Plaintiff, ORDER RE: CROSS-MOTIONS FOR 9 v. JUDGMENT ON THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD 10 BERT BELL/PETE ROZELLE NFL PLAYER RETIREMENT PLAN, et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 33, 36 11 Defendants. 12 13 Plaintiff is a former player in the National Football League. He challenges the decision of 14 the Retirement Board of the Bert Bell/Pete Rozelle NFL Player Retirement Plan (the “Plan”) to 15 deny him total and permanent disability benefits under the Plan and the Employee Retirement 16 Income…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. HinksonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Abatie v. Alta Health & Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Wanda Glenn v. Metlife (Metropolitan Life Insurance Company) and Long Term Disability Plan for Associates of Sears, Roebuck and CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- Rhode Island v. Narragansett Indian TribeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.