Fairholme Funds, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
MARGARET M. SWEENEY, Judge
On May 20 and May 25, 2016, in order to facilitate discovery in this ease, the court ordered the production of 58 documents — a sample of the approximately 12,000 documents that defendant claimed were privileged — for in camera review.1 Subsequent to that production and before the court issued its ruling, defendant withdrew its claim of privilege as to two of the documents. The court therefore reviewed and. ruled on 56 documents over which defendant claimed the presidential communications privilege (claimed as to all or part of 4 documents), the deliberative…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Fairholme Funds, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017