Legal Opinion

People v. Wallace

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 26, 2003No. A092782Published

1Opinion of the Court

129 Cal.Rptr.2d 292 (2003)

105 Cal.App.4th 250

The PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Appellant,

v.

Harold Austin WALLACE, Defendant and Respondent.

No. A092782.

Court of Appeal, First District, Division Four.

January 10, 2003.

Review Granted March 26, 2003.

Gary T. Yancey, District Attorney, Doug MacMaster, Deputy District Attorney, for appellant.

William D. Farber, for respondent.

REARDON, J.

A jury convicted respondent Harold Austin Wallace of being an ex-felon in possession of a firearm. (See Pen.Code,[1] §§ 667, subd. (e), 12021, subd. (a)(1).) The trial court found two prior conviction allegations—both strikes…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. Superior Court (Romero)California Supreme Court · 1996
  2. People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  3. People v. GarciaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  4. People v. MyersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  5. People v. CluffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API