Legal Opinion

Detroit Free Press Co. v. Board of State Auditors

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 26, 1881PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Mandamus.

1Opinion of the CourtCooley, J.

This is an application for a mandamus. The petition sets forth that in June, 1881, the Secretary of State advertised for proposals to do the printing and binding for the State for the years 1881 and 1882. The advertisement *137required tbe printing to be included in a single bid and to embrace tbe following:

1. Tbe printing of tlie laws, daily and official journals and documents and reports and all other printing ordered by the Legislature, except compilations of the laws which might thereafter be ordered — or by an executive officer. These were to be printed in different type and style as was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Ayres v. Board of State AuditorsMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
  2. People ex rel. Dewey v. Board of State AuditorsMichigan Supreme Court · 1875

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Matter of Application of Air Terminal Services, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Arkansas Democrat Co. v. Press Printing Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1893
  3. Andrews v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Capital Printing Co. v. HoeySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1899
  5. Dictaphone Corp. v. O'LearyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API