Central Nebraska Natl. Bank v. Wilder
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error to the district court for Butler county. Tried below before Smith, J. Dow v. Gould, eta., Min. Co., 31 Cal., 629; 2 Wait’s Actions & Def., sec. 6; Morse on Banks & Banking, sec. 43; Marlborough Mfg. Co. v. Smith, 2 Conn., 579; Oxford v. Bunnel, 6 Id., 552; Colebrooke, Coll., sec. 280. Farrington v. Tennessee, 95 U. S., 679; Bradley v. Bauder, 36 O. St., 35; Watson v. Spratley, 10 Exch. [Eng.], 236; Conant v. Bank, 1 O. St., 309; 19 Am. L. Rev., 579.
1Opinion of the CourtMaxwell, J.
This is an action brought by the defendant in error against the plaintiff in error, to recover a dividend declared on ten shares of the stock of the bank.
On the trial of the cause in the court below, judgment was rendered in favor of the defendant in error.
The principal error relied upon in this court is that the evidence is insufficient to sustain the judgment.
It appears from the record that in January, 1888, one M. Gould was the cashier of the bank in question, and borrowed from the defendant in error the sum of $1,000, for which he gave his note payable in one year, with interest at eight…
2Cited by4 opinions
- National Bank of Commerce v. Equitable Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1915
- Steel v. Island Milling Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1906
- Bank of Waverly v. DailyNebraska Supreme Court · 1918
- Baar v. Fidelity & Columbia Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1946