State v. Elverman

¶ 1. Jeffrey Elverman, pro se, appeals the judgment of conviction for theft greater than $10,000, contrary to Wis. Stat. §§ 943.20(l)(a) and *181(3)(c) and 939.50(3)(g) (2003-04).2 He also appeals the order denying his postconviction motion.3 Elverman presents numerous arguments on appeal: (1) that the complaint was defective because it did not sufficiently give him notice of the charges against him; (2) that the statute of limitations had expired prior to commencement of the criminal proceedings as to all but two checks at issue, or alternatively, that the statute of limitations had expired as…