Legal Opinion

Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Hiscock

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided April 28, 1923Published

1Opinion of the CourtWhitfield, J.

In the praecipe for summons ad res'. filed herein, J. D. Hiscock was the sole plaintiff. The summons issued on the praecipe was the only summons attempted to be served on the defendant corporation. The return is fatally defective in that it shows service on the “manager” of the defendant without showing the ab*481sence of superior officers. Drew Lumber Co. v. Walter, 45 Fla. 252, 34 South. Rep. 244.

Under the statute regulating- the service of summons on private corporations, where the return shows service upon a mere agent of the defendant company, without showing the absence of all the officers…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Drew Lumber Co. v. WalterSupreme Court of Florida · 1903
  2. Milton Land & Investment Co. v. Our Home Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Florida · 1921
  3. Seacoast Lumber Co. v. R. J. & B. F. Camp Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API