Heino v. One 2003 Cadillac, MN License No. KFR615, VIN: 1G6KS54Y83U131208
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CONNOLLY, Judge.
The state appeals the district court’s decision denying forfeiture of respondent’s car. We reverse and remand.
FACTS
The facts in this case are undisputed. On March 7, 2007, respondent Charlotte Mary Heino was arrested for fourth-degree DWI. She was given a notice of intent to revoke her driver’s license stating that the revocation would take place on March 14, 2007. On March 22, 2007, respondent filed a petition for judicial review (PJR) of her license revocation. A hearing on the PJR was set for May 1, 2007. On April 9, 2007, respondent waived the requirement that the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Frost-Benco Electric Ass'n v. Minnesota Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- State v. RichardsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
- Heddan v. DirkswagerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- State v. WiltgenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Woodruff v. 2008 MercedesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2013
- State v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2019