Legal Opinion

H. F. Campbell Construction Co. v. Palombit

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 28, 1956No. Docket 68, Calendar 46,369PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDethmers, C. J.

Plaintiff, a building contractor, acting through defendant Palombit, a subcontractor, purchased from defendant Mosaic Tile Company certain tile manufactured by defendant Carlyle Tile Company. and delivered by it, on consignment, to Mosaic. This suit is for damages resulting from alleged defects in the tile, laid by Palombit, which became apparent after their use in one of plaintiff’s, construction jobs. Service on defendants Palombit and Mosaic is not challenged. Service of summons on Carlyle, an Ohio corporation not licensed to do business in Michigan, was made' by personal service thereof…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. F. J. Dewes Brewery Co. v. MerrittMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Pratt v. BurhansMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Mishawaka Woolen Manufacturing Co. v. StantonMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Worden Grocer Co. v. BlandingMichigan Supreme Court · 1910

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hasley v. Black, Sivalls & Bryson, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Stewart v. Bus and Car Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1968
  3. June v. Vibra Screw Feeders, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1967
  4. Dolce v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1959
  5. Jennings v. WSM, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API