Legal Opinion
Crispino v. Allard
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 21, 2005No. 04 CIV. 0343(RWS)PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Domenick Crispino (“Crispino” or the “Petitioner”), appearing pro se, has petitioned for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 alleging that he is being held in state custody in violation of his constitutional rights. The respondent Michael J. Allard, Superintendent of Franklin Correctional Facility (the “Superintendent” or the “State”) has opposed the petition. For the reasons set forth below, the petition is denied. Furthermore, Cris-pino’s February 28, 2005 letter motion for leave to demand documents is also denied.
Prior Proceedings
Three…
2Cases cited71 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Estelle v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Edwards v. Superintendent, Southport C.F.District Court, E.D. New York · 2013
- Taylor v. ConnellyDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2014
- Davis v. Nassau CountyDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2007
- Howard v. McGinnisDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2009
- Olivares v. ErcoleDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.