Legal Opinion

Burgess v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 25, 2014No. ED 99440PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COHEN.

Introduction

Manuel Burgess (Movant) appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis denying without an evidentia-ry hearing his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. Movant contends the motion court clearly erred in denying his claim that his counsel provided ineffective assistance by failing to advise him that, if he pleaded guilty, he would be subject to “lifetime parole supervision with electronic monitoring.” We affirm.

Factual and Procedural Background

The State charged Movant with four counts of first-degree statutory rape (Count I, II, IV, and VI), one…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Padilla v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  4. McLaughlin v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2012
  5. State v. RollSupreme Court of Missouri · 1997

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Arak L. McCoy v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2015
  2. Larry E. Johnson v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. Larry E. Johnson v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014
  4. Rodney E. Allen v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2015
  5. Walter D. Combs v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2021

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API