Burgess v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
COHEN.
Introduction
Manuel Burgess (Movant) appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis denying without an evidentia-ry hearing his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. Movant contends the motion court clearly erred in denying his claim that his counsel provided ineffective assistance by failing to advise him that, if he pleaded guilty, he would be subject to “lifetime parole supervision with electronic monitoring.” We affirm.
Factual and Procedural Background
The State charged Movant with four counts of first-degree statutory rape (Count I, II, IV, and VI), one…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Padilla v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- McLaughlin v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2012
- State v. RollSupreme Court of Missouri · 1997
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Arak L. McCoy v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2015
- Larry E. Johnson v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014
- Larry E. Johnson v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014
- Rodney E. Allen v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2015
- Walter D. Combs v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2021
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.