Legal Opinion

Stewart v. Martin

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided June 2, 1930PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said decree of the circuit court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Terrell, C. J., and Whitfield and Buford, J. J., concur.

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Dillman v. TedderSupreme Court of Florida · 1936
  2. McMullen v. McMullenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1962
  3. Pittman v. RobertsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1960
  4. Brogan v. FergusonSupreme Court of Florida · 1930
  5. Hill v. Gratigny Plateau Development Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1931

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API