Stewart v. Covill & Basham Construction, LLC
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Leaphart
¶1 Jody Stewart (Stewart) appeals from the District Court’s order enforcing the arbitration clause located in her contract with Respondent, Covill and Basham Construction, LLC (Covill and Basham). We affirm.
¶2 The sole issue on appeal is: Did the District Court err in enforcing the arbitration clause by concluding that Covill and Basham had not impliedly waived the right to arbitrate?
Factual and Procedural Background
¶3 On October 1,2000, Covill and Basham, a construction company, and Stewart entered into a construction agreement (Agreement). The Agreement provides that Covill and Basham would…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Thiel v. JohnsonMontana Supreme Court · 1985
- Holm-Sutherland Co., Inc. v. Town of ShelbyMontana Supreme Court · 1999
- Downey v. ChristensenMontana Supreme Court · 1992
- Firestone v. Oasis Telecommunications, Data & Records, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2001
3Cited by9 opinions
- Lamell Lumber Corp. v. Newstress International, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2007
- Lamell Lumber Corp. v. NEWSTRESS INTERN.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2007
- Paragon Ltd., Inc. v. BolesSupreme Court of Alabama · 2007
- Peeler v. Rocky Mountain Log Homes Can., Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2018
- Hoover General Contractors-Homewood, Inc. v. KeySupreme Court of Alabama · 2016
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.