The Hunter
District Court, D. California
In Admiralty. Libel in rem by a seaman to recover his lay in the oil and bone taken by a whaling ship.
1Opinion of the CourtHoffman, J.
The proofs, I think, show that the libelant was engaged at a lay of the 1-100. He so swears himself, and he is corroborated by the testimony of Mr. Russell, who was engineer on board the ship-wrecked vessel Rainbow, from which they were received with others of the crew of the latter. At the time of his shipment, in answer to the master’s inquiry, he said that his lay on board the Rainbow was the 1-100 lay. In fact it was the 1-125 lay, but the master believed his statement, and agreed, as he alleges, to take him on the same lay. It is admitted that shipwrecked seamen taken on board a ship in…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Fred I. Putnam and James A. Overman v. Harry C. Lower, John Kadlec, George S. Herning, Edgar L. Peecher, William E. Barquist and Norman L. BunkerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
- Sagliuzzo v. FrymierCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1926
- The Barbara HernsterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1906
- Hogan v. The J. D. PetersDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1896