Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Mathis

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 15, 1991No. 1901266PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

We granted certiorari review in this case to address the issue of whether the petitioner, a white male defendant, had standing, under the principles of Batson v. Kentucky,476 U.S. 79, 106 S.Ct. 1712, 90 L.Ed.2d 69 (1986), to claim that the prosecutor's alleged use of peremptory challenges to remove black jurors from the trial venire violated his constitutional rights.1

The Court of Criminal Appeals, stating what it thought to be the law, held that a "nonblack" defendant could not raise aBatson challenge, but did note that "the standard articulated in Batson may be broadened at some future…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Griffith v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Linkletter v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Powers v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Ferguson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2008
  2. Bush v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2009
  3. Guthrie v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1991
  4. Guthrie v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1992
  5. Yancey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2009

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API