Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Little v. Slagle

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1905PublishedCited by 23 opinions

FROM KNOX. Appeal from Chancery Court of Knox County.— Joseph W. Sineed, Chancellor.'

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Neil

The facts out of which the present controversy arose are as follows:

At the August election, 1904, Daniel W. Little was elected one of the constables for the Fourth district of Knox county, and duly qualified and entered upon his duties as such. In December, 1904, the sheriff of Knox county appointed Mr. Little one of his regular deputies, to serve process in the portion of the county in which the latter resided, being a section of the county remote from Knoxville. Mr. Little accepted the appointment and entered upon the discharge of the duties assigned him. Thereupon, at the January term,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. BrinkerhoffTexas Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Oliver v. Mayor of Jersey CitySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1899
  3. State ex rel. Platt v. KirkIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  4. Chambers v. State ex rel. BarnardIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Foltz v. KerlinIndiana Supreme Court · 1886

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Book v. State Office Building CommissionIndiana Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Oklahoma City v. Century Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  3. Glasgow v. FoxTennessee Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Ivy v. OsborneTennessee Supreme Court · 1925
  5. State ex rel. Kendall v. ColeNevada Supreme Court · 1915

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API