Legal Opinion

Pair v. Queen

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided August 26, 2010No. 08-CV-1646PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FISHER, Associate Judge:

Appellants, personal representatives and beneficiaries of Dr. Clarence Pair’s estate, challenge the Superior Court’s dismissal of their malpractice claims against the professionals who prepared and filed the estate’s tax returns. In addition, appellants contest the dismissal of their breach of fiduciary duty claim against a former co-personal representative. Appellants also complain about the trial court’s order awarding costs to appellees after dismissing one count of the original complaint at appellants’ request. We affirm the trial court’s award of costs, but…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. United States v. BoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Charles N. Schwarz, Jr. v. Harry Folloder, Alexander Grant & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
  3. Bartlett v. American National Bank & Trust Co. of SapulpaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
  4. Robinson v. Howard UniversityDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. Talley v. VarmaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Beach TV Props., Inc. v. SolomonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
  2. Beach Tv Properties Inc. v. SolomanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API