Legal Opinion

Weber v. Rosenheim

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 30, 1889PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Julius S. Grinnell, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtGary, P. J.

This is an action commenced before a justice of the peace upon a promissory note, as follows:

$75 “ Chicago, October 16, 1885.

“ Twelve months after date I promise to pay to the order of Henry Sartorius, seventy-five dollars. This note is secured by the Hoffnung Building, Loan & Homestead Association of W. Chicago. Value received.
“John J. Weber.”

On the back was written :

“This note is not transferable.”

It was indorsed by the payee to the appellee for value in July, 1886, and without notice in fact to the latter, that there could be any defense to it. The consideration for it was an agreement of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Siegel, Cooper & Co. v. Chicago Trust & Savings BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Prins v. South Branch Lumber Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1886
  3. Siegel v. Chicago Trust & Savings BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1889

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Blair v. KirchnerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1943
  2. Herrick v. EdwardsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1904
  3. Casten v. WindettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925
  4. Hines v. Union National BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1897
  5. Liberty State Bank v. AulgarAppellate Court of Illinois · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API