Legal Opinion

Rostant v. Borden

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 26, 1961No. Civ. 24755PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NOURSE, J. pro tem. *

Appellant is the plaintiff in an action brought by her against respondent to recover damages for personal injuries. She appeals from the judgment entered upon verdict of the jury in favor of respondent.

Appellant makes three assignments of error. Only one of them has any substance whatsoever. We will first treat of the other two.

She complains that the court erred in instructing the jury on contributory negligence. She does not complain that the instructions given were erroneous but asserts that there was no evidence of contributory negligence to which the jury could apply…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Prescott v. Ralphs Grocery Co.California Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Ching Yee v. Dy FoonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Beauchamp v. Los Gatos Golf CourseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  2. Hook v. Point Montara Fire Protection DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  3. Curran v. Green Hills Country ClubCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  4. Rodriquez v. Lompoc Truck Co.California Court of Appeal · 1964
  5. Romero v. And'raCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API