Legal Opinion

In Re the Marriage of Hockaday

Montana Supreme Court

Decided June 1, 1989No. 88-514PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gulbrandson

Hugh Hockaday, the husband, appeals the division of property mandated in the final dissolution of marriage decree entered by the Eleventh Judicial District Court, Flathead County. Martha Hockaday, the wife, filed a cross-appeal requesting the correction of numerous factual and mathematical errors in the District Court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law. We affirm the District Court’s valuation of those marital properties disputed by appellant and the method employed by the court to equitably distribute the property. We remand the case, however, for a correction of various errors, more…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re the Marriage of StewartMontana Supreme Court · 1988
  2. In Re the Marriage of MilesnickMontana Supreme Court · 1988
  3. In Re the Marriage of HallMontana Supreme Court · 1987
  4. In Re Marriage of LeProwseMontana Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Marriage of Schultz v. SchultzMontana Supreme Court · 1980

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re the Marriage of JohnsMontana Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Marriage of Otto v. OttoMontana Supreme Court · 1990
  3. In Re the Marriage of JohnsMontana Supreme Court · 1989
  4. In Re the Marriage of RuffMontana Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Marriage of GrayMontana Supreme Court · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API