Legal Opinion
Joint Stock Co. v. National City Bank
New York Court of Appeals
Decided July 15, 1925PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGrane, J.
Pursuant to rules 104 and 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice, the plaintiff made a motion for an order striking out the answer of the defendant herein, and directing judgment for the plaintiff upon the ground that the answer was sham and frivolous, and that there was no defense to the action. The appeal to this court, by permission, is" from a summary judgment entered upon said motion in favor of the plaintiff, unanimously affirmed by the Appellate Division.
The complaint in substance alleges that the plaintiff is a corporation doing business prior to June 12, 1918, in Russia and in Poland;…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Close v. Glenwood CemeterySupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Sokoloff v. National City BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1924
- Wulfsohn v. Russian Socialist Federated Soviet RepublicNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
- Russian Socialist Federated Soviet Republic v. CibrarioNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
- Fred S. James & Co. v. Second Russian InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Kunglig Jarnvagsstyrelsen v. Dexter & Carpenter, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1929
- Vladikavkazsky Railway Co. v. New York Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1934
- Sliosberg v. New York Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
- Consolidated Placers, Inc. v. GrantNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1944
- A. A. Sutain, Ltd. v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1965
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.