Legal Opinion

Nordan v. D.C. Board of Elections

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided December 27, 2024No. 24-AA-1125Published

1Opinion of the Court

2 order to obtain relief, the petitioners’ burden is not only to show defects or irregularities in the election; petitioners must prove also that the flawed election led to a result that is not true.”) (brackets and internal quotation marks omitted). Nordan makes two arguments to support her request. Her first argument, that she should be declared the winner although she was not the top write-in vote recipient because she was the only one to file a post-election declaration of candidacy, was rejected in Sobin v. D.C. Bd. of Elections, No. 24-AA-1124, Judgment at 2 (D.C. Dec. 26, 2024).…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Jackson v. District of Columbia Board of Elections & EthicsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
  2. Scolaro v. District of Columbia Board of Elections & EthicsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API