Legal Opinion
In re Weinger, Bergman & Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 14, 1903PublishedCited by 18 opinions
In Bankruptcy. On motion for reargument.
1Opinion of the Court
HOLT, District Judge.
This is a motion for a reargument of a motion to compel the replevying creditors and a city marshal (Samuel I. Abramson) to turn over to the receiver property taken by them in a replevin action. The affidavits on this motion, which are uncontradicted, show that a petition in involuntary bankruptcy was filed against the bankrupts at 2:10 p. m. on October 30, 1903. About the same time that afternoon, the marshal, Abramson, appeared-at the store of the bankrupts with writs of replevin in two suits brought against the bankrupts in the municipal court of the city of New York…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Mueller v. NugentSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- In re KenneyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1900
3Cited by18 opinions
- Taubel-Scott-Kitzmiller Co. v. FoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- May v. HendersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Rathman v. BoothCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1910
- In re Jersey Island Packing Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1905
- United States v. O'DELLCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1947
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.