Legal Opinion

Thermocarbon, Inc. v. Dicing Technology, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 20, 1990No. 90-280Published

1Opinion of the Court

GOSHORN, Judge.

Thermocarbon, Inc. appeals an order dismissing with prejudice Count II of its complaint which alleged a cause of action for false and deceptive advertising proscribed by the Lanham Trade-Mark Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a).1 The basis for the trial court’s dismissal was its finding that the federal court has exclusive original jurisdiction. Because we find the state court has concurrent jurisdiction, we reverse the order and remand to the trial court with instructions to reinstate Count II. See Flagship Real Estate Corp. v. Flagship Banks, Inc., 374 So.2d 1020 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979). See…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Flagship Real Estate Corp. v. FLAGSHIP BK.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
  2. Mastro Plastics Corp. v. Emenee Industries, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1964
  3. Entex Industries, Inc. v. Warner CommunicationsDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API