Legal Opinion

Altesman v. Eli Lilly & Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided August 13, 1990PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Collins, J.), dated May 15, 1989, as granted those branches of the plaintiffs’ motion which were to compel it to respond to items numbered 3 (e), 3 (f), 22 (c), and 51 of their interrogatories, and denied those branches of its cross motion which were to strike those items of the plaintiffs’ interrogatories.

Ordered that the order is modified, by (1) deleting the provisions thereof which granted so much of those branches of the motion…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Allen v. Crowell-Collier Publishing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1968
  2. Hoenig v. WestphalNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. Wind v. Eli Lilly & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re New York County Des LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1992
  2. Wind v. Eli Lilly & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  3. SKEK Associates v. BenensonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API