Legal Opinion

B. Nathaniel Richter and Elwood S. Levy v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided November 16, 1961No. 13563PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOODRICH, Circuit Judge.

The plaintiffs effected a settlement with a railroad in a Federal Employers’ Liability Act case and paid part of the recovery to the United States under statutory provision. They now claim counsel fees against the Government on that part of the settlement paid to it. Plaintiffs lost in the court below. 190 F.Supp. 159 (1960).

The facts are undisputed. The plaintiffs, as lawyers, secured on behalf of an employee of the Pennsylvania Railroad the sum of $16,800. The railroad, in satisfaction of a lien of the Railroad Retirement Board, paid the United States $2,210. This…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Evans v. DudleyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1961
  2. Richter v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1960

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. William Ballwanz, to the Use of Liberty Mutual Insurance Company v. Jarka Corporation of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1967
  2. Corujo Collazo v. Viera MartínezSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1981
  3. Joseph Drake v. Treadwell Construction Company, and Third-Party v. United States of America, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1962
  4. Shanks v. AldersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  5. United States v. NationDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1969

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API