Legal Opinion

United States v. Ramos-Ruiz

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 3, 2004No. 04-10130; D.C. No. CR-03-00170-HDMPublished

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM**

Jose Reyes Ramos-Ruiz appeals his sentence imposed following his guilty plea to unlawful reentry, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). He contends that his 46-month sentence exceeded the statutory maximum allowed under Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), because he did not admit, and the government did not prove to a jury, his prior aggravated felony conviction, which the court used to increase his term pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) and the United States Sentencing Guidelines. This contention is foreclosed by United States v.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. United States v. Oscar Quintana-QuintanaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  3. United States v. Ramon Nunez-RodeloCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API