Legal Opinion
Dinesh Shah v. Janet Reno
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided July 1, 1999No. 98-2636PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RICHARD S. ARNOLD, Circuit Judge.
In this case we are called on to decide important questions of the jurisdiction of the federal courts to review decisions of the Executive Branch with respect to immigration. Two statutes enacted in 1996 have narrowed the rights of certain classes of immigrants and restricted the jurisdiction of the federal courts to review claims raised by those immigrants. The two statutes are the Anti-terrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (AEDPA), Pub.L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214, 1268, 1276-77, enacted on April 24, 1996, and the Illegal Immigration Reform and…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Reno v. American-Arab Anti-Discrimination CommitteeSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Felker v. TurpinSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Swain v. PressleySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Franklin Henderson v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, Saul Navas v. Janet Reno, as Attorney General of the United States, Engin Yesil v. Janet Reno, Attorney General Doris Meissner, Commissioner of the Immigration and Naturalization Service Immigration and Naturalization Service John B.Z. Caplinger, District Director Nancy Hooks, Officer in Charge, Guillermo Mojica v. Janet Reno, as Attorney General of the United States, Saul Navas v. Janet Reno, as Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Shah v. RenoCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
- Bowrin v. INSCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999