Legal Opinion

Darling v. Moscowitz

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided June 14, 1916PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from City Court of New York, Special Term. Action by William A. Darling against Louis S. Moscowitz. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff appeals. Reversed.

1Opinion of the CourtGuy, J.

The complaint alleges that the defendant entered into an agreement with the plaintiff, a real estate broker, employing plaintiff to perform services as such broker in procuring the owner of certain premises to sell them to the defendant for $52,000, it being understood and agreed by defendant that plaintiff was to get his commission of 1 per cent, on the purchase price for making the sale from the owner of the said premises; that relying upon defendant’s agreement the plaintiff performed services as such broker and secured the consent of the owner of the premises to sell them to the defendant…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Mulhall v. Bradley & Currier Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Aronson v. CarobineCity of New York Municipal Court · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API