Legal Opinion

Travel Express Investment Inc. v. AT & T Corp.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 26, 2009No. 5D08-2504PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSawaya, J.

The issue we must resolve is whether a forum selection clause, which provides that “[t]he parties consent to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts located in New York City, USA,” is mandatory or permissive. This issue comes to us via an order denying a motion to dismiss for improper venue filed by Travel Express Investment Inc. in a breach of contract action brought against it by AT & T in Seminole County, Florida. The trial court concluded that the clause is permissive, denied the motion, and allowed the litigation to proceed. We conclude, however, that the clause is mandatory and reverse…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Manrique v. FabbriSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
  2. Management Computer v. Perry Const.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
  3. Granados Quinones v. Swiss Bank Corp.Supreme Court of Florida · 1987
  4. GOLF SCORING SYSTEMS UNLIMITED v. RemedioDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
  5. Golden Palm Hospitality, Inc. v. STEARNS BANK NATL. ASS'NDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Michaluk v. Credorax (USA), Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
  2. Antoniazzi v. WardakDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
  3. Agile Assurance Group Ltd. v. PalmerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
  4. Singer v. Unibilt Development Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
  5. InVas Medical Devices LLC v. Zimmer Biomet CMF and Thoracic LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2022

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API