Legal Opinion · Dissent

Brinkley v. . Spruill

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 4, 1902Published

1DissentCook, J.

This case was before the Court a year ago, and is reported as Brinkleyv. Brinkley, 128 N.C. 503, and a full statement of the facts will be found there. But in that case the effect of an innocent purchaser for a full price and without notice of the contract of the plaintiff with W. H. Brinkley from one of the grantees of the said J. H. Brinkley was not considered. The deed the Court declared to be fraudulent and void as to the plaintiff was made to the five children of the said J. H. Brinkley, by a former marriage, and was without consideration. But it appears by the case now before the Court…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Potts v. . BlackwellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1857
  2. Poston v. . GillespieSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1859
  3. Brinkley v. Brinkley.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1901
  4. Triplett v. WitherspoonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1874

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API