Legal Opinion

80 South Eighth Street Ltd. Partnership v. Carey-Canada, Inc.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 26, 1992No. C1-91-1427PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KEITH, Chief Justice.

The Federal District Court of Minnesota has certified to this court three questions of law:

1. Whether the economic loss doctrine as set forth in Superwood Corp. v. Siempelkamp Corp., 311 N.W.2d 159 (Minn.1981), and Hapka v. Paquin Farms, 458 N.W.2d 683 (Minn.1990), bars the owner of a building with asbestos-containing fireproofing from suing the manufacturer of the fireproofing under the tort theories of negligence and strict liability for the costs of maintenance, removal and replacement of the fireproofing?

2. If the economic loss doctrine as set forth in Hapka would bar…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Seely v. White Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Hapka v. Paquin FarmsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  3. Northridge Co. v. W.R. Grace & Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Superwood Corp. v. Siempelkamp Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  5. prod.liab.rep.(cch)p 11,525 City of Greenville, and Greenville Water System v. W.R. Grace & Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1987

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Sentinel Management Co. v. New Hampshire Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
  2. Wausau Tile, Inc. v. County Concrete Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Morris v. Osmose Wood PreservingCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
  4. Lyon Financial Services, Incorporated, d/b/a U.S. Bancorp Business Equipment Finance Group v. Illinois Paper and Copier CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
  5. United States Gypsum Co. v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API