Legal Opinion
Pataky v. Pataky
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided October 7, 2004No. 571A03PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Per curiam
As to the appeal of right based on the dissenting opinion, we affirm the majority decision of the Court of Appeals. We conclude that the petition for discretionary review as to an additional issue was improvidently allowed.
AFFIRMED; DISCRETIONARY .REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED.
2Cited by5 opinions
- Balawejder v. BalawejderCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
- Andrews v. AndrewsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
- Jackson v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2021
- Upchurch v. UpchurchCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014
- Walton v. WaltonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018