Legal Opinion
FARHANGUI v. GROSSINGER
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided January 4, 2021No. 2:20-cv-02002Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA BIJAN FARHANGUI, CIVIL ACTION Plaintiff, v. DOUGLAS R. GROSSINGER, NO. 20-2002 Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION This extensively litigated but straightforward contract dispute arises from two loan agreements (“the Agreements”) between Plaintiff Bijan Farhangui and Defendant Douglas Grossinger. Pursuant to the Agreements, Farhangui loaned money to Grossinger, an attorney, for Grossinger’s work on a complex litigation matter, to be repaid with 100% interest. Grossinger defaulted on the loans, and Farhangui sued for breach…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Reginald D. Ware Ware Communications, Inc. v. Rodale Press, Inc. Ware CommunicationsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
- Alvaro Quiroga v. Hasbro, Inc. And Playskool Baby, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- Charles Harris v. Green Tree Financial CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
- Atacs Corporation Airtacs Corporation, in 97-1812 v. Trans World Communications, Inc., in 97-1813. Nos. 97-1812, 97-1813Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
- Quilloin v. Tenet HealthSystem Philadelphia, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.