Fritchey Lumber Co. v. B. F. Isenberg Milling Co.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 48, Oct. T., 1901, by plaintiff, from judgment of C. P. Huntingdon Co., Sept. T., 1900, No. 20, for defendant non obstante veredicto in case of Fritchey Lumber Company v. B. F. Isenberg Milling Company. Sheriff’s interpleader. Before Bailey, P. J. The facts appear by the opinion of the Supreme Court. Error assigned was in entering judgment for defendant non obstante veredicto. •
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
William W. Portee, J.,
This appeal is from a judgment entered non obstante veredicto after trial of a sheriff’s interpleader to determine the ownership of certain pine logs. The execution was issued upon a judgment against a partnership of which Frank Fritchey was a member. The plaintiff in the feigned issue is Linnie A. Fritchey (the wife of Frank Fritchey), trading as the Fritchey Lumber Company. The testimony of the plaintiff and of her husband was substantially that he (being at the time insolvent) borrowed for her from one, Stoler, the sum of $100. For this the husband gave his…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Adams v. GreySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1898
- Walter v. JonesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892
- Frost v. KnappSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1899
3Cited by1 opinion
- Shaw v. NewinghamSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926