Legal Opinion
Morton v. Central Nat. Bank
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided April 9, 1935No. 23809PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Per curiam
Judgment was obtained by the Central National Bank of Okmulgee, Okla., a corporation, against Wm. P. Morton and Walter W. Morton, the suit being based upon a promissory note, and from that judgment this appeal has been taken.
Defendants, in their answer, alleged “that they made and entered into an agreement with the plaintiff by which defendants were to pay the sum of $500 to apply on said alleged indebtedness and plaintiff was to extend the time of payment of said alleged note for a period of 90 days and defendants now tender the sum of $500 into court in compliance with said agreement.” This…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Bank of United States v. DandridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
- Knox County v. Ninth National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Lee v. LittleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Home Insurance Co. of N.Y. v. WhitchurchSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
- Cyr v. WalkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Liberty Nat. Bank of Weatherford v. SemkoffSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- COLCLAZIER & ASSOCIATES v. StephensCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2012
- C. Robert Ingram, Inc. v. The Chrysler Corporation, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1958
- Empire Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. SpurlockSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
- SOONER FED. S & L v. Okl. Cent. Cr. UnionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.