Legal Opinion

Brookfield v. Hecker

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

Decided October 7, 1902PublishedCited by 1 opinion

In Equity. On demurrer to bill. See 114 Fed. 1021.

1Opinion of the Court

TOWNSEND, Circuit Judge.

Complainants were appointed receivers by the court of chancery in New Jersey, and by the United States circuit court for the Southern district of New York, of a corporation organized tinder the laws of the state of New Jersey, and carrying on business in the state of New York. The receivers bring this suit in their own names for infringement of trade-marks and unfair competition in trade. Complainants claim that the court has jurisdiction notwithstanding the lack of diverse citizenship, on the ground that the courts which appoint receivers have the power to protect the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Davis v. GraySupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  2. Porter v. SabinSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  3. Pope v. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1899
  4. Harland v. Bankers' & Merchants' Tel. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1887

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Wilson v. Kansas City Power & Light Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API