Legal Opinion

Gazola v. Savage

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 8, 1906PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from Monroe Circuit Court, George M. Chapline, Judge; 1. The homestead is limited as to quantity and value, and must be owned and occupied as a residence. Kirby’s Digest, § 3900; art. 9, § 5, Const. It appearing by the evidence that the lot contained more than one-fourth of an acre, it was incumbent on appellee to show that it did not exceed $2,5qo in value. 2. Appellee, as appears by the evidence and her acts, has abandoned her homestead .rights in the premises.

Read the full summary

Appeal from Monroe Circuit Court, George M. Chapline, Judge; 1. The homestead is limited as to quantity and value, and must be owned and occupied as a residence. Kirby’s Digest, § 3900; art. 9, § 5, Const. It appearing by the evidence that the lot contained more than one-fourth of an acre, it was incumbent on appellee to show that it did not exceed $2,5qo in value. 2. Appellee, as appears by the evidence and her acts, has abandoned her homestead .rights in the premises. A homestead necessarily includes the idea of residence. Thomp. H. & Ex. § ioo; 57 Ark. 181. Mere intention is not sufficient…

1Opinion of the CourtMcCulloch, J.

Appellant, John Gazola, recovered a judgment against appellee, Mrs. M. J. Savage, on May 28, 1897, in the circuit court of Monroe County for the sum of $605.42, and on August 29, 1904, caused execution to be issued thereon, which was by the sheriff levied upon a lot owned by appellee in the city of Brinkley. Appellee claimed the lot as her homestead, and filed her schedule of exemptions with the clerk of the court, who issued a supersedeasi staying the sale under execution. Appellant presented to the circuit court at the next term his motion to quash the supersedeas, which motion was denied,.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Schuman v. SandersonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1904
  2. Robson v. TomlinsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1891
  3. Newton v. RussianSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1905

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Arkansas Power & Light Co. v. CatesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1930
  2. City National Bank v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1936
  3. Harris v. RaySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1913
  4. Armour Company v. RoseSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931
  5. Gebhart v. MerchantSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1907

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API