Legal Opinion
Doe v. Sanger
California Supreme Court
Decided January 25, 1889No. 12847PublishedCited by 5 opinions
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Bernardino County. The facts are stated in the-opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Foote, C.
— This is an action of trespass upon certain mining property. A demurrer was filed to the amended complaint, and overruled; an answer was filed, a trial had, and judgment rendered for the plaintiff, from which this appeal is taken, and the reason urged for its reversal is, as alleged, that the demurrer ought to have been sustained.
The trespass is averred, in the amended complaint, to have taken place “on or about the thirtieth day of June,
1886, and prior thereto from about the first day of November, 1883, until said thirtieth day of June, 1886.” The suit was brought on the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Wise v. HoganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
3Cited by5 opinions
- Pleasant v. SamuelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Cunningham v. Los Angeles Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1897
- Dow v. City of OrovilleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
- Tristam v. MarquesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Bryan v. AbbottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900