Legal Opinion

City Savings Bank & Trust Co. v. Pluchel

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided January 2, 1931PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

Numerous assignments of error are made in the petition in error, but these assignments can readily be reduced to three or four propositions.

The issues in brief, were first: Whether or not this money was ever deposited in this box by Pluchel, and if so, was it ever abstracted therefrom by any person other than Pluchel, or without his knowledge and consent? Second: If this money was abstracted from the box by some representative of the bank, was this conduct on the part of such representative such as to bind the b,ank and make it liable for the loss of this money?

The questions with reference to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Preston v. PratherSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Foster v. President of the Essex BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1821
  3. Fatta v. EdgertonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. O'MALLEY v. Putnam Safe Deposit Vaults, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API