Legal Opinion

In re Eliason

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided March 22, 1921No. For. Attach., No. 85Published

1Opinion of the CourtConrad, J.

(delivering the opinion of the court). Garnishment process will not lie against a trustee. Plunkett v. Le Huray, 4 Harr. 436.

Money of client in the hands of his attorney cannot be attached. Johns v. Allen, 5 Harr. 419.

Neither an administrator nor the debtor of the estate can be attached as garnishee. Lyons’ Adm’r v. Houston, Ex’r, 2 Harr. 349.

The State Treasurer is not liable to attachment for money due from the state to an individual. Farmers’ Bank v. Ball, 2 Pennewill, 374, 46 Atl. 751.

In the case at bar, the petitioners were clerks at a public sale of the personal property of Pearl T.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. President of Farmers Bank v. BallSuperior Court of Delaware · 1900

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API